候选人

Title: The Chase Year: 1966 Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller Country: USA Language: English, Spanish Director: Arthur Penn Screenwriter: Lillian Hellman based on the play and novel by Horton Foote Composer: John Barry Cinematographer: Joseph LaShelle Editor: Gene Milford Cast: Marlon Brando Jane Fonda Robert Redford E.G. Marshall Angie Dickinson James Fox Janice Rule Robert Duvall Richard Bradford Miriam Hopkins Marha Hyer Diana Hyland Henry Hull Jocelyn Brando Katherine Walsh Clifton James Steve Ihnat Nydia Westman Malcolm Atterbury Joel Fluellen Bruce Cabot Ken Renard Rating: 7.0/10 Title: The Candidate Year: 1972 Genre: Drama, Comedy Country: USA Language: English Director: Michael Ritchie Screenwriter: Jeremy Larner Composer: John Rubinstein Cinematographer: Victor J. Kemper Editors: Robert Estrin, Richard A. Harris Cast: Robert Redford Peter Boyle Melvyn Douglas Don Porter Allen Garfield Karen Carlson Quinn K. Redeker Michael Lerner Kenneth Tobey Morgan Upton Natalie Wood Jenny Sullivan Rating: 6.9/10 Title: Out of Africa Year: 1985 Genre: Romance, Drama, Biography Country: USA Language: English, Swahili, Arabic Director: Sydney Pollack Screenwriter: Kurt Luedtke Based on the novel by Karen Bixen Composer: John Barry Cinematographer: David Watkin Editors: Pembroke J. Herring, Sheldon Kahn, Fredric Steinkamp, William Steinkamp Cast: Meryl Streep Robert Redford Klaus Maria Brandauer Michael Kitchen Suzanna Hamilton Malick Bowens Michael Gough Rachel Kempson Graham Crowden Leslie Phillips Shane Rimmer Joseph Thiaka Stephen Kinyanjui Donal McCann Iman Rating: 8.0/10 Title: Sneakers Year: 1992 Genre: Crime, Comedy, Mystery, Thriller Country: USA Language: English, Russian Director: Phil Alden Robinson Screenwriters: Phil Alden Robinson, Lawrence Lasker, Walter F. Parkes Composer: James Horner Cinematographer: John Lindley Editor: Tom Rolf Cast: Robert Redford Sidney Poitier Dan Aykroyd David Strathairn Mary McDonnell River Phoenix Ben Kingsley Stephen Tobolowsky Timothy Busfield Eddie Jones George Hearn Donal Logue Lee Garlington James Earl Jones Rating: 7.2/10 Title: The Conspirator Year: 2010 Genre: Crime, Drama, History Country: USA Language: English, Latin Director: Robert Redford Screenwriter: James D. Solomon Composer: Mark Isham Cinematographer: Newton Thomas Sigel Editor: Craig McKay Cast: James McAvoy Robin Wright Evan Rachel Wood Danny Huston Tom Wilkinson Kevin Kline Alexis Bledel Justin Long James Badge Dale Colm Meaney Johnny Simmons Norman Reedus Toby Kebbell David Andrews Jonathan Groff Stephen Root John Cullum John Michael Weatherly Marcus Hester Chris Bauer Jim True-Frost Shea Whigham Rating: 6.7/10 Title: The Old Man & the Gun Year: 2018 Genre: Crime, Comedy, Biography, Romance Country: USA, UK Language: English Director/Screenwriter: David Lowery based on the article by David Grann Composer: Daniel Hart Cinematographer: Joe Anderson Editor: Lisa Zeno Churgin Cast: Robert Redford Casey Affleck Sissy Spacek Danny Glover Tom Waits Tika Sumpter Teagan Johnson Ari Elizabeth Johnson John David Washington Gene Jones Elisabeth Moss Isiah Whitlock Jr. Keith Carradine Rating: 6.6/10 Another hefty blow to film lovers across the globe, RIP Robert Redford (1936-2025), whose face has always been both a blessing and a hindrance. Hollywood adores it, audiences trust and are enamored of it, but Redford himself seems to treat it as an albatross: a disarming mask that threatens to suffocate the man beneath. Few actors so photogenic have worked so hard to complicate their own charisma. He is never content to play only the golden boy or the outlaw with a twinkle, instead, with his own inconspicuous resolve, he probes the uneasy marriage between integrity and image, freedom and compromise. A retrospective of his career through these selected six films (including one his directorial effort), we tend not to just clock the arc of a great actor, but a man forever negotiating the paradox of being both an icon and an iconoclast. What unifies these disparate films is not genre, or even quality, but the way Redford situates himself in relation to others. Scarcely is he the loudest performer on screen. Instead, he is the calibrator - the one who allows Brando’s bruised integrity, Fonda’s frazzled vacillation, Streep’s righteous rigor, Poitier’s no-nonsense authority, or Spacek’s gingerly warmth to lay out in sharper relief. His wheelhouse lies in restraint: an actor who has no single bone of theatricality in him, who seems altruistic to a fault by leaving room for his partners. To appreciate Redford fully, one has to study not only him but those who played alongside him, and how his stillness or buoyancy alters their rhythms. When Penn cast Redford in THE CHASE, the actor was on the cusp of becoming a household name. The film itself is a sprawling ensemble piece based on a Horton Foote play - part Southern gothic, part social allegory, part Brando experiment. At its center is Sheriff Calder (Brando), straining to hold a corrupt Texas town together as escaped convict Charlie "Bubba" Reeves (Redford) heads home. Around them swirl Fonda as Bubba’s conflicted wife, Fox as her paramour and Bubba's best friend, Duvall as a pathetic cuckold while Rule as his two-timing wife, Marshall as the town patriarch and Fox's father, Dickinson as Calder’s loyal wife. The film is overheated, almost to the point of parody, with characters seething and snarling about topical issues like race, class, repression, ennui and sexual liberation, but no one cares to explicate why they are afraid of Bubba, whose lawless wildness is only referred to but never verified, which, sad to say, results in a disappointing coda where unjustified vengeance is thrown in to incite pathos and defeated heroism. However, THE CHASE does anticipate BONNIE AND CLYDE (1967) with Penn's radical rendition of overblown violence, it is difficult to suppress a gasp when Brando's blood-stained puffy face is in sight. Brando, by this stage of his career, is quite unpredictable, oscillating between brilliance and rut-stuck nonchalance. His Calder is weary, sweaty, sometimes looks too tired to enunciate, but can still holds the bar of intensity high when he is required to be. Penn's supporting players also deliver, especially on the distaff side: Fonda is sharply expressive in registering moral panic; Rule struts her stacked stuff like nobody's business and is a brazen vixen who is prone to be flirtatious and shoot disparaging contempt in the next breath; also we shall not undersell Hopkins's searing desperation as Bubba's mother, her last memorable impression on the celluloid screen. Due to his none-too-sizable screen time, Redford steals some gravitas into playing Bubba not as a larger-than-life outlaw but as a wary, wounded animal, moving with economical gestures, speaking little, watching much. He feels morally intact in a world of corruption, refuses to join the hysteria, and paradoxically draws the camera to him, to elicit an oceanic effusion of compassion and indignation when the sorry ending approaches. By the early 1970s, Redford had found a way to turn that restraint into insightful social critique. Ritchie's THE CANDIDATE remains one of the most incisive portraits of American politics ever made (although viewed under today's political mood, it is only reminiscent of a simpler time and an understatement one can be blasé about). Redford plays Bill McKay, a young lawyer recruited to run for Senate as a Democratic candidate by campaign manager Marvin Lucas (Boyle). The deal: McKay will lose gracefully, inject fresh ideas into the race, and return to obscurity. But as momentum builds, McKay discovers the machinery of image-making is too strong to resist. Arguably, this is Redford’s most "actorly" role, not least because he is tasked to be the film's focal point, the camera's follow him at close quarter constantly with close-ups, capturing both his public persona and private gut check. Surrounded by a gaggle of secondary players, including Boyle's Lucas - oily, manipulative, both cynical and oddly candid, every line uttered with the nicety of a man who sees democracy as marketing - and Douglas, as McKay’s amicable senator father (casually hits home the birth of an archetypal nepo baby), whose mere presence a judgment, Redford makes the best of his pliability. We watch his expressions shift as handlers feed him lines, as crowds cheer, as he realizes he is becoming a product. McKay's famous final line“What do we do now?” lands because Redford has spent the entire film showing us a man hollowed out by success. His McKay begins earnest, ends plastic, and Redford carves out his gradual capitulation to the political machinations with a vanishingly understated relatability, canvassing his beliefs, selling false hopes, perfecting his performative skills, all contribute to that improbable ambiguity and unreality of being a politician (encapsulated by McKay's involuntary guffaws inside the TV station, it is Redford in his most eloquent form apropos of theatricality). Few actors of his stature would risk being so unheroic, and is able to extract a modicum of lucidity out of such a murky journey. Fast forward to OUT OF AFRICA, Redford is now a global star and has an Oscar under his belt (for directing ORDINARY PEOPLE, 1980). Pollack’s Oscar's BEST PICTURE winner is, on the surface, Streep’s star vehicle: she is Karen Blixen, Danish baroness and writer, navigating a troubled marriage, a failing coffee plantation, and a love affair with the enigmatic Denys Finch Hatton (Redford). Streep’s performance is riveting to behold, every accent gesture, and inflection meticulously and emotively regulated and fine-tuned to emulate Karen's personality. Brandauer, as her husband wedded by a matrimony of convenience, is erratic and unapologetically self-seeking , a man whose charm and cruelty intertwine. Redford, by contrast, seems to float above the film. He doesn’t even attempt a British accent and this choice is telling: Redford plays Denys not as a historically accurate Englishman but as a myth of "a man cannot be tethered by society's norms". His performance is about aura, not detail. Where Streep works from the outside in, Redford works from the inside out, exuding ease, freedom, lightness. The famous hair-washing scene captures this dynamic perfectly: Streep trembles with vulnerability, her control stripped away, while Redford, calm and tender, embodies a kind of elemental care. The chemistry isn’t fireworks but contrast: her precision against his looseness, her vulnerability against his composure. Together they create the tension of opposites, and that tension sustains the film. Granted, the catch of Pollack's breathtaking epic is glaring: it's a classic and eyes-rolling "white savior" fantasy, the local African people are mostly shown in the background. They're basically just part of the scenery, silent figures whose only purpose is to help the main characters with only a few tokenized acknowledging that the land was taken and exploited by colonization. However, one still can argue that OUT OF AFRICA is a masterpiece for a reason. It's not trying to be a historical documentary (the reality would be even harsher); it's a personal memoir about one woman's life. The story is a super intimate, heartbreaking look at her experiences with love, loss, and how the vast beauty of Africa completely changed her. The film's grand scale - those indescribably awestruck long shots of the continent's landscape and fauna, John Barry's incredibly sonorous and felicitous score - is exactly what's needed to transport audience to vicariously experience the overwhelming emotions and sweeping romance. Africa itself becomes a character, a silent, incurious witness to the unfolding colonist drama. Notwithstanding its historical blind spots, OUT OF AFRICA is a majestic exemplar of old-school filmmaking in its fullest swing, its emotional truth lies in its heartfelt portrayal of a once-in-a-lifetime affaire de coeur and the pain of saying goodbye. By the 1990s, Redford had settled into elder statesman status, but he remained playful. SNEAKERS is, beyond doubt, one of his most underrated films - a caper that is equal parts comedy, thriller, and character study. Redford's Martin Bishop leads a ragtag team of security experts: Poitier as an ex-CIA man, Aykroyd as a conspiracy theory-obsessed gadgeteer whose moniker is "mother", Phoenix as a tender hacking prodigy, Strathairn as a visually impaired techie genius (the script cannot resist the temptation of putting a blind man behind the wheel when push comes to shove). Then occasionally McDonnell is invited to the sausage party by the Smurfette principle, whose throwaway banter about computer dating (the forefather of online dating) during a crucial moment in front of Cosmo (Kingsley), Martin's friend-to-foe, almost scupper the entire teamwork A fascinating time capsule documenting the philosophical clash between analog espionage and emerging digital security. SNEAKERS' MacGuffin is a device capable of decrypting any encryption, whose power is both absolute and terrifyingly abstract. The meat of the team's methods - bluffing, pretending, phreaking, pilfering, information phishing - are low-tech, high-IQ, and still chillingly effective today. The film argues that the best hacking happens in person, a truly unorthodox stance in the era of CGI-fueled digital warfare. Robinson's film could have easily collapsed into chaos, but Redford provides the anchor and his performance is about holding the ensemble together: allowing Aykroyd’s manic riffs fly, listening to Poitier with amused respect, indulging Phoenix’s earnestness, bantering with Strathairn’s deadpan wit, demurring towards Kingsley's villainous coercions and toying with McDonnell's old flame dalliance. Bishop is the quintessential straight arrow endowed with sly humor: Redford adds twinkles of irony, a grin at just the right moment, a dry quip that cuts through tension. Compared to the hyper-kinetic, information-dense, casualty-mounting thrillers of today, SNEAKERS sometimes feels like it’s executing code via punch cards, even the centerpiece of theft requires Martin to move glacially in order not to trigger the alarm. But, when all is said and done, the film is not about the technology, but the philosophy of information access and the socialistic "share and share alike" message that definitely touch a raw nerve to all the capital holders. It is a shame Martin doesn't jump on the bandwagon of Cosmo's proposal. Now, let's not forget Redford's efforts behind the camera. THE CONSPIRATOR, his 8th feature as a director, dramatizes the trial of Mary Surratt (Wright), accused of conspiring to assassinate Abraham Lincoln. McAvoy plays Frederick Aiken, the young lawyer pressurized to defend her by his mentor Senator Reverdy Johnson (Wilkinson). Redford approaches the tragic and ethically complex trial with such unimpeachable reverence for historical procedure that the narrative occasionally collapses under its own seriousness. While the production design (the period lighting, the oppressive courtroom setting) is commendable, the film’s major vulnerability is its legalistic languor. The pacing, while authentic to the drudgery of a 19th-century trial, often acts as a form of cinematic waterboarding. Every scene is delivered with the same somber, respectful velocity, as if the camera itself is worried about insulting the historical record. Guilty of being a superb, yet stiff, piece of legal pedagogy, THE CONSPIRATOR comes through as an impeccably staged seminar on early military tribunal law, recommended for its masterful demonstration of how political pressure can corrupt justice McAvoy is tasked with humanizing the process, yet he often feels more like a tour guide through the Articles of War than a man fighting for a rightful cause. His moral awakening is logical, not visceral (sometimes he even tries to bring a semblance of levity into the play, but that runs jarringly athwart Redford's direction). Wright presents an airtight defense of ambiguity, delivering her testimony in micro-expressions, forcing the audience to become jury members attempting to decrypt the truth from beneath the bonnet. This is historical cinema that insists you bring your own emotional dictionary. Wilkinson and Kline (playing Edwin Stanton, Secretary of War) bring gravitas, threatening to tip into theatricality, but Redford keeps them in check, preferring undercurrent to flourish. It’s a choice consistent with his career: distrust of excess, preference for restraint. He insists on sobriety, on moral ache, even at the expense of dramatic thrill. One might wish for more ammunition to galvanize the courtroom, but one respects the rationale behind his choice. Finally, THE OLD MAN & THE GUN, Redford's final film as a leading performer, could not be a more fitting swan song. Lowery's film is loosely based on the story of Forrest Tucker (Redford), an aging bank robber who can’t stop robbing because he loves it too much, who demonstrates an operational methodology built entirely on charisma, courtesy, and elegant simplicity. Redford, employing the far more effective tools of good manners and an undeniable smile to implement his "heists", is pluperfect to inhabit Tucker's mindscape. Tucker’s brilliance lies in his refusal to escalate conflict; he disarms victims with decency, making the police effort (led by Affleck's Detective John Hunt) feel almost tragically pointless. The sheer ease with which he executes his craft—which includes escaping prison by building a cozy little boat - suggests that if you commit to an absurd act with enough style, the system simply doesn't know how to file the complaint. Tapping into an overwhelming feeling of nostalgia, the film essentially functions as a soft-focus retirement party for Robert Redford, celebrating the iconography of the charismatic rogue he perfected decades earlier. It moves with the comfortable gait of a man who seems to know he has all the time in the world. While this makes for a pleasurable viewing experience, the narrative sacrifices urgency for mood. It’s a heist film where the stakes feel less like life-or-death and more like a gently scheduled appointment. Tucker's budding late-life romance with Jewel (a luminous Spacek) woozily offsets the none-too-intense tension of his high-stakes profession. Their scenes together crackle not with passion but with tenderness, two actors of immense subtlety listening to each other, brimmed with mutual affections. It is the cinematic equivalent of a perfect bourbon nightcap after a day’s work. Affleck's Hunt is a weary counterpoint: hunched, muttered, dogged. His fatigue sharpens Redford’s lightness - the cop trudges, the robber floats. THE OLD MAN & THE GUN is a crime film that feels perversely safe. It succeeds by transforming the anxiety of illegal activity into the quiet pleasure of living a life fully realized, even if that life involves repeated felonies. Redford could have leaned into pathos, but instead he leans into joy: the grin, the charm, the boyishness undimmed by age. It is not a farewell steeped in nostalgia but also in delight. To look at Redford’s body of work is to look at America wrestling with its own reflection. Few actors have so consistently embodied not just characters but archetypes: the outlaw scapegoat, the candidate-turned-puppet, the dream lover on the plains, the team leader navigating troubled waters, the director probing justice in history, the old rogue who refuses to surrender to age. Each role feels like an iteration of the same question: what does it mean to live honestly inside a culture built on performance? Part of Redford’s gift is geographical. He is a Western star in the truest sense, though not in the mold of John Wayne. Where Wayne thundered across Monument Valley, Redford brought the plains and mountains inside himself - the openness, the quiet, the refusal to be pinned down. He was an actor who carried wide skies in his stillness. The ranch in Utah, Sundance, the festival, the institute - all of it fed back into his persona. Unlike the studio stars of old, Redford created an ecosystem around himself, a place where he could cultivate not only films but filmmakers, stories, ideals. He understood that to control your image, you must also control the means of production. This sextet of films also remind us that even control is slippery. THE CANDIDATE is prescient about politics as image-making and votes-coveting; OUT OF AFRICA enshrines him as a myth that dangerously erases his specificity; SNEAKERS anticipates the surveillance state and digital era with a smirk; THE CONSPIRATOR insists history’s trials repeat themselves with grim inevitability; and THE OLD MAN & THE GUN insists that the pursuit itself - the chase, the con, the grin — is as close to truth as we may ever get. Perhaps that is why Redford remains such a singular figure. He does not reassure. He does not thunder with certainty. Instead, he embodies doubt, restlessness, contradiction - but does so with a charisma that makes us lean closer rather than turn away. He has been accused of aloofness, of coolness, of being too controlled. Yet within that control is an ethic: an insistence that cinema need not scream to matter, that myth can coexist with skepticism, that the brightest smile can also hide the deepest unease. In the end, Robert Redford is less a movie star than a mirror - one held up to America’s hopes, hypocrisies, romances, and regrets. His career reminds us that authenticity is not a given but a struggle, that freedom is not a destination but a chase, and that sometimes the most radical act in Hollywood is not to invent a character, but to let the cracks in your own face do the storytelling. referential entries: Arthur Penn's THE MIRACLE WORKER (1962, 8.3/10); Gene Saks' BAREFOOT IN THE PARK (1967, 5.4/10); George Roy Hill's THE STING (1973, 8.2/10); Sydney Pollack's THREE DAYS OF CONDOR (1975, 6.7/10); Robert Redford's QUIZ SHOW (1994, 6.9/10); Rod Lurie's THE CONTENDER (2000, 7.1/10); David Lowery's A GHOST STORY (2017, 7.0/10), THE GREEN KNIGHT (2021, 7.3/10).